Minnesota joins 10 other states in push to ban mRNA-based vaccines

04/15/2025 / By Ava Grace

Lawmakers in Minnesota introduced House File (HF) 3152 on April 7, proposing to ban mRNA-based vaccines within the state – making the North Star State the 11th one to consider such legislation.
The bill defines mRNA vaccines as those using messenger RNA, modified mRNA, self-amplifying mRNA or DNA technology.
HF 3152 imposes a $500 fine per offense for violators, with potential disciplinary action by state medical licensing bodies.
The push for the ban is driven by reported adverse reactions – including deaths, hospitalizations and cases of myocarditis and pericarditis – documented in the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
The bill reflects a broader debate about the balance between personal freedom, public health and manufacturer liability. Public health experts criticize the legislation, stating that state lawmakers lack the necessary expertise to evaluate vaccine safety.

Lawmakers in Minnesota introduced legislation on April 7 to ban the use of mRNA-based vaccines there, making the North Star State the 11th state to implement such a prohibition.

HF 3152 states that “no person shall provide or administer a gene-based vaccine to another person in this state.” The bill defines mRNA vaccines as those developed using messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology, modified mRNA technology, self-amplifying mRNA technology or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) technology. Violators would face a $500 fine per offense and potential disciplinary action by the relevant state medical licensing bod

If passed, the bill would have far-reaching implications for healthcare providers and public health initiatives in the state. However, its prospects are uncertain in the Minnesota Legislature – with a Democratic-controlled state Senate and an evenly-divided House. Gov. Tim Walz, a far-left Democrat, is also unlikely to sign it into law.

But Minnesota isn’t alone in this endeavor, however. Lawmakers in Idaho, Iowa and Montana have introduced similar legislation since the start of 2025.

McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher pointed out that while none of these bills have become law yet, they represent a significant shift in the political landscape. These proposals reflect growing skepticism and concerns about the safety and long-term effects of mRNA vaccines, which were rapidly developed and deployed during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. (Related: MEDICAL BOMBSHELL: FDA admits Covid mRNA ‘Vaccines’ CAUSE CANCER.)

Growing push to ban dangerous mRNA vaccines

The push to ban mRNA-based vaccines in various U.S. states is rooted in a series of reported adverse reactions and safety concerns. The federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has documented thousands of deaths, hospitalizations, heart attacks and cases of cardiac inflammation following mRNA vaccinations. Even researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have acknowledged a high verification rate of myocarditis (heart muscle inflammation) reports in VAERS, suggesting that under-reporting is more likely than over-reporting.

Iowa State Sen. Doug Campbell (R-District 30) who introduced a similar bill, argued that vaccine manufacturers should be held accountable for any adverse reactions. “If I was a manufacturer of car tires and they [delaminated] at 1,000 miles, I should be liable for that,” he said. Campbell’s proposal initially sought an outright ban, but was later modified to require mRNA vaccine manufacturers to waive liability protections.

Public health experts meanwhile denounced efforts to ban these injections at the state level. William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University, expressed disappointment and distress at the legislation.

He emphasized that state lawmakers lack the necessary knowledge and background to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. “It’s as though state legislatures wish to take over a function of the Food and Drug Administration and they’re simply not in a position to do that,” Schaffner remarked.

Despite criticism, the introduction of HF 3152 in Minnesota is part of a broader trend of legislative actions aimed at regulating mRNA-based vaccines. The outcome of these legislative efforts will have far-reaching implications for healthcare, public health and medical research.

Watch Dr. Robert Malone and Del Bigtree touching on the risks of mRNA vaccines in this interview on “The HighWire.”

This video is from The HighWire with Del Bigtree channel on Brighteon.com.